Hi, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > On 07/02/2016 19:58, Axel Beckert wrote: > > Alastair McKinstry wrote: > >> - libboost-dev (>= 1.53.1), libboost-mpi-dev, dh-autoreconf, > >> + libboost1.58-dev, libboost1.58-mpi-devm dh-autoreconf, > > > > This looks rather scary to me. > > > > Since libboost-dev (currently) directly depends on libboost1.58-dev, > > there is no need to replace the dependency on libboost-dev with > > libboost1.58-dev. > > Ok, the libboost1.58-dev is not needed if boost-dev makes it into > testing;
There is no such package "boost-dev". Did you mean libboost-dev? A libboost-dev which depends on libboost1.58-dev_is_ in Testing: https://packages.qa.debian.org/b/boost-defaults.html > I just included it to get the pkg to build, boost1.55 FTBFS at the moment. I was surprised to see that boost1.55 is still in unstable. > A decision from the Boost team on which Boost is going to stretch is > desirable. I'm very sure it won't be 1.55 -- no idea if a version newer than 1.58 is targeted. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE