On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 12:52:56AM +0000, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:46:22PM +0000, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > Yes, that is certainly it. Now, should I ask for a binNMU, or reupload?
> > > I suspect clamav is not binNMU safe (it uses = ${SourceVersion} in a few
> > > places, so probably a reupload is better.> > Yeah, not binNMU safe; you'll have to do a sourceful upload. > That's what I figured. Now, is there a way to tell that the buildd's > have caught up to the fixed debhelper version, or do I just take it on > faith? I guess you could randomly sample a recent package build for each arch using logs on buildd.debian.org to see which version of debhelper is used... :/ -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
