Markus Koschany, on Wed 24 Feb 2016 23:31:01 +0100, wrote: > Since you are still waiting for upstream's opinion and the packages are > not tested yet, I suggest the following steps.
They are tested already, in various cases. I'd just like to know whether that fixes all known issues. > 1. Revert this change as soon as possible > 2. Ask on debian-java, or people who reported this issue to test the > packages. I would suggest to write down what exactly should be > installed and tested. I don't believe 2. will happen properly. It's only when using a package everyday that bug reports show up. That's why the default parameter was set. I was however simply not aware that this was posing so many problems: I wasn't made aware of all the mentioned in #813143. Really, I'll just upload the fixed java-atk-wrapper, it has been tested quite well already. Samuel
