Your message dated Mon, 29 Feb 2016 21:37:27 +0000
with message-id <e1aavvp-0003mm...@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#816254: fixed in ruby-packetfu 1.1.11-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #816254,
regarding ruby-packetfu: FTBFS: expected NameError with "uninitialized constant 
PacketFu::FakePacket", got #<NameError: uninitialized constant 
PacketFu::FakePacket
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
816254: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816254
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-packetfu
Version: 1.1.11-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

ruby-packetfu fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:

  [..]
  
  
RUBYLIB=/home/lamby/temp/cdt.20160229080748.jorFXxpWp0/ruby-packetfu-1.1.11/debian/ruby-packetfu/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby:.
 
GEM_PATH=debian/ruby-packetfu/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all:/home/lamby/.gem/ruby/2.3.0:/var/lib/gems/2.3.0:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/rubygems-integration/2.3.0:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/2.3.0:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all
 ruby2.3 debian/ruby-tests.rb
  /usr/bin/ruby2.3 -rrspec/its /usr/bin/rspec --pattern 
spec/\*\*\{,/\*/\*\*\}/\*_spec.rb
  rspec 3.3.2
  
.......................................................................F................................................................................................................................................................................
  
  Failures:
  
    1) PacketFu protocol requires should have some protocols defined
       Failure/Error: expect { PacketFu::FakePacket }.to raise_error(NameError, 
"uninitialized constant PacketFu::FakePacket")
         expected NameError with "uninitialized constant PacketFu::FakePacket", 
got #<NameError: uninitialized constant PacketFu::FakePacket
         Did you mean?  FakePacket> with backtrace:
           # ./spec/packetfu_spec.rb:52:in `block (3 levels) in <top 
(required)>'
           # ./spec/packetfu_spec.rb:52:in `block (2 levels) in <top 
(required)>'
       # ./spec/packetfu_spec.rb:52:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
  
  Finished in 0.27801 seconds (files took 0.19639 seconds to load)
  248 examples, 1 failure
  
  Failed examples:
  
  rspec ./spec/packetfu_spec.rb:48 # PacketFu protocol requires should have 
some protocols defined
  
  /usr/bin/ruby2.3 -rrspec/its /usr/bin/rspec --pattern 
spec/\*\*\{,/\*/\*\*\}/\*_spec.rb failed
  ERROR: Test "ruby2.3" failed. Exiting.
  dh_auto_install: dh_ruby --install 
/home/lamby/temp/cdt.20160229080748.jorFXxpWp0/ruby-packetfu-1.1.11/debian/ruby-packetfu
 returned exit code 1
  debian/rules:4: recipe for target 'binary' failed
  make: *** [binary] Error 1

  [..]

The full build log is attached.


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

Attachment: ruby-packetfu.1.1.11-1.unstable.amd64.log.txt.gz
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-packetfu
Source-Version: 1.1.11-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ruby-packetfu, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 816...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro.dua...@gmail.com> (supplier of updated ruby-packetfu 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 16:36:03 -0300
Source: ruby-packetfu
Binary: ruby-packetfu
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers 
<pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro.dua...@gmail.com>
Description:
 ruby-packetfu - mid-level packet manipulation library for Ruby
Closes: 816254
Changes:
 ruby-packetfu (1.1.11-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Create patch fixing tests with ruby2.3 (Closes: #816254)
   * d/copyright: add Upstream-Contact and set up upstream email
   * Update Debian packaging copyright
   * Declare compliance with Debian policy 3.9.7
Checksums-Sha1:
 7e7472c2aef1752d0909672add053cc3dc8eb05e 2094 ruby-packetfu_1.1.11-2.dsc
 de4d087931b86f0b4f9c4706c03a0f6d381bb74e 4780 
ruby-packetfu_1.1.11-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 a8d3644d52da52963a95be9f42a54e3443229bf87df03b60571d77eb5904e71c 2094 
ruby-packetfu_1.1.11-2.dsc
 aa959c98dd45689df1392c0b8df33d0f404e6bc8cb0f57374c811a54d097667d 4780 
ruby-packetfu_1.1.11-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 6701c9a238a406c825f635ec0097ad5c 2094 ruby optional ruby-packetfu_1.1.11-2.dsc
 f5daf589381c05e6ad1682fd7a155d69 4780 ruby optional 
ruby-packetfu_1.1.11-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=uQD9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to