Le 11/02/2016 21:50, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > Le 11/02/2016 21:01, Andreas Tille a écrit : > >> any hint why this test that worked before might fail since end of >> December? > > I got a quick look and I can't explain this test failure. It doesn't > seem very important though, you could just disable this test.
I just upgraded htsjdk (required for picard-tools). It does not seem to FTBFS anymore (pushed in git). I plan to upload it when picard-tools will be ready but if someone can take a look at it before, I would be pleased. In particular, there is in debian/control: === Build-Depends: openjdk-8-jre-headless, openjdk-8-jdk, ... Build-Conflicts: openjdk-7-jre-headless === And, in debian/rules: === dh_auto_build -- -Dant.build.javac.source=1.8 -Dant.build.javac.target=1.8 ... === Is it the correct way to build a package that requires java 8? I do not change this part myself and did not check the requirement, but I just saw with picard-tools (same upstream authors) that java 8 is also required ( <> operator (>=7) and lambda expressions (>=8) ) so I would like to be sure to do the correct thing. Regards, Vincent > Emmanuel Bourg > -- Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0xD17897FA vdanj...@debian.org GPG key fingerprint: 621E 3509 654D D77C 43F5 CA4A F6AE F2AF D178 97FA Unofficial pkgs: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html APT repo: deb http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main