Peter Palfrader wrote: > Also, Tor continues to be as fine as ever for people who don't offer > hidden services, so maybe grave is a bit strong.
Nonetheless it is a serious security hole for people who *do* run hidden services. I thought grave might be a bit too high, but serious is specifically for Debian Policy violations, and important seems a bit too weak. If there was something between grave and important (e.g. "a security issue with a particular menu item") I would have picked that. In the abscence of such a severity I stand by my decision of grave. (Better it be considered more severe than it is, than to be considered less severe than it is.) -- Chris Howie http://www.chrishowie.com -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/IT d-(--) s:- a--->? C++(+++)$> UL++++ P++++$ L+++>++++ E--- W++ N o++ K? w--$ O M- V- PS--(---) PE++ Y+ PGP++ t+ 5? X- R(+)>- tv-(--) b- DI+> D++ G>+++ e>++ h(--)>--- !r>+++ y->+++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
