On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On 29 March 2016 at 04:11, Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Mar 2016, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > > >> On 5 March 2016 at 19:54, Sam Morris <s...@robots.org.uk> wrote: > >> > severity 796611 grave > >> > thanks > >> > > >> > This is currently causing my system to boot without networking. I am > >> > increasing the severity since other (rather important!) packages are > >> > affected (I assume that I was just lucky until now). > >> > > >> > I'm currently using the attached unit file to work around the breakage. > >> > It's the same as the one I sent in before, but with > >> > WantedBy=sysinit.target as advised by Felipe Sateler in the thread > >> > above. > >> > >> I have uploaded an nmu. I have made the unit call out to the init > >> script, because it does more work than simply invoking ferm. > >> > >> Please find attached the debdiff > > I find 0-day nmus highly intrusive. Stop that practise. > > Current convention as codified in the devref is to upload 0-days for > RC bugs over 7 days old. This bug had been open without maintainer > input for 6 months (with potential seriousness noted), and has been RC > severity due to actual breakage for almost a month. I will not stop > NMUing fixes for such bugs. Especially if I just said a few minutes ago that I'll take care of it.
Alex
