Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 08:44:25PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >>> Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> > debiandoc-sgml does no longer build Debian FAQ. >>> > >>> > $ latex /tmp/error.tex >>> > This is e-TeX, Version 3.14159-2.1 (Web2C 7.4.5) >>> > entering extended mode >>> >>> This is not the version in unstable, but in testing or sarge. >>> >>> Hm. Bad if that has the effect that debiandoc-sgml cannot be backported >>> to sarge withouth changes. Is this really a problem - there are also >>> other alternatives, although less elegant. >> >> I think it is better to make debiandoc-sgml compatible with tetex 2.0 >> and 3.0. If anyone propose good fix, I will use it as the next update. > > The alternative is to drop "[force]" and use "\currency" instead of > "\textcurrency".
In fact there's a much easier solution: add "force" to the global options that you give to the documentclass (near the "11pt"). In this case, each package will pick it if and only if it understands it; so the textcomp problem is solved. None of the packages loaded by Debiandoc-sgml-Dokuments understand the option "force". I didn't check for any packages loaded indirectly from within the explicitly loaded packages; but I don't think it's probably that any other package uses "force". You can always change to \currency in addition to that if you like the wasy character better. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
