On Sat, 23 Jul 2016 13:30:19 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote: > On 23/07/16 12:40, James Cowgill wrote: > > Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/gpac/gpac/issues/592 > > > > On Thu, 2016-07-21 at 19:12 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:30:01 +0200 "Mathieu Malaterre" <ma...@debian.org> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> This is a continued operation since src:jasper removal for stretch > >>> release. > >>> > >>> src:openjpeg will be removed from Debian for the stretch release > >>> (and following that, the archive in general). For more information > >>> see: http://bugs.debian.org/826805 > >>> > >>> It has been superseeded by src:openjpeg2 > >>> > >>> Your package uses src:openjpeg, so please either remove the > >>> JPEG2000 functionality or move to the new API. > >> > >> Ping? It looks like your package already uses libjpeg-turbo. Can we > >> just drop the openjpeg support? If not, can you forward this > >> upstream? This is the last key package still depending on openjpeg, > >> and it is going to block its removal from Stretch. > > > > I've forwarded the bug, but are there any objections to removing > > openjpeg support in the meantime? There doesn't seem to be any users of > > the openjpeg support in other Debian packages at least. > > That'd be good in order to finish the transition. But I don't use gpac.
Can that be done? Cheers, Emilio
