source: cufflinks version: 2.2.1-2 severity: serious Hi Andreas, as said in private emails, the package FTBFS with the new toolchain, but what you didn't notice, is that the failure is not boost related, but gcc-6 (the default since yesterday) instead.
In file included from ./lemon/bits/base_extender.h:23:0, from ./lemon/list_graph.h:26, from ./lemon/dfs.h:26, from ./lemon/topology.h:22, from assemble.cpp:19: ./lemon/error.h: In member function 'lemon::ExceptionMember<_Type>& lemon::ExceptionMember<_Type>::operator=(const lemon::ExceptionMember<_Type>&)': ./lemon/error.h:70:27: error: return-statement with no value, in function returning 'lemon::ExceptionMember<_Type>&' [-fpermissive] if (ptr.get() == 0) return; ^~~~~~ ./lemon/error.h:72:21: error: return-statement with no value, in function returning 'lemon::ExceptionMember<_Type>&' [-fpermissive] if (!copy.valid()) return; ^~~~~~ seems that you are returning nothing, in a method created to return an ExceptionMember& pointer ExceptionMember& operator=(const ExceptionMember& copy) { I don't have a patch, sorry! something like this: @@ -67,9 +67,9 @@ namespace lemon { } ExceptionMember& operator=(const ExceptionMember& copy) { - if (ptr.get() == 0) return; + if (ptr.get() == 0) return copy; try { - if (!copy.valid()) return; + if (!copy.valid()) return copy; *ptr = copy.get(); } catch (...) {} } makes it build, but of course this isn't a patch, it is just a dirty hack (wrong) to see if the build works after that point, and yes, the boost can be switched back to the default (so, 1.61 works) http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/cufflinks/2.2.1-2.1/buildlog cheers, G.