On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 04:56:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 02:39:57PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > To clarify: You want us to support having imagemagick from sarge
> > installed + pulling in graphicsmagick from etch, but pulling
> > graphicsmagick from etch + later installing imagemagick from sarge is
> > intentionally left broken? For now I've added the Replaces, but I think
> > that's a half-baked solution.
> 
> It's not broken; current dpkg understands that Replaces: should take effect
> even if the replaced package is installed after the package that replaces
> it.

Current dpkg does, but the feature was added post-sarge in 1.13.2. As
far as I understand, it should only be relied upon post-etch?

Regards,

Daniel.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to