On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:41:17 +0200, intrigeri wrote:

> The test suite now passes most of the time on ci.d.n, since 2015-11.
> 
> The only recent failure there is
> https://ci.debian.net/data/packages/unstable/amd64/libd/libdevel-gdb-perl/20160607_104749.autopkgtest.log.gz
> 
> Still, on the reproducible builds infra it FTBFS recently, due to the
> exact same test failing:
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/unstable/amd64/libdevel-gdb-perl_2.02-2.rbuild.log
> 
> I'm going to split the brittle test into two smaller ones, for
> debugging purposes.


Since then:
- it built on the buildd:
  https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libdevel-gdb-perl&ver=2.02-3
- it never failed on ci.d.n:
  https://ci.debian.net/packages/libd/libdevel-gdb-perl/unstable/amd64/
  https://ci.debian.net/packages/libd/libdevel-gdb-perl/unstable/arm64/
- it built in the reproducible build setup on all 3 arches:
  
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/libdevel-gdb-perl.html
  but indeed there are failures in the past:
  https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/libdevel-gdb-perl.html
- it failed for Santiago (message #51)
- I still can't get t/expect.t to fail, even if running it under
  heavy load in a loop.
- On the CPAN testers we see occosional failures:
  http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Devel-GDB+2.02


Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer -  https://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Dire Straits: Calling Elvis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature

Reply via email to