2016-10-06 12:24 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl>:
> On 10/06/2016 12:21 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > 2016-09-21 11:53 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl>: > > > >> On 09/21/2016 11:34 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > >>> 2016-09-21 10:24 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org>: > >>>> I see you dropped support for armel in #818552 and requested the > removal > >>>> of the outdated armel binaries. That's fine. However, nodejs doesn't > >>>> migrate to testing because the lack of armel binaries breaks a number > >>>> of packages that depend on nodejs on armel: > >>>> > >>>> trying: nodejs > >>>> skipped: nodejs (15, 0, 81) > >>>> got: 68+546: a-3:i-18:a-0:a-11:a-0:m-0:m-0:p-35:p-0:s-1:m-546 > >>>> * armel: node-almond, node-groove, node-iconv, node-leveldown, > >>>> node-node-expat, node-sqlite3, node-topcube, node-websocket, node-ws, > >>>> node-xmlhttprequest, qtwebchannel5-examples > >>>> > >>>> Those need to get their armel binaries removed as well. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Thank you for your help, at some point i believed the request for > removal > >>> implied removal of dependencies as well. > >>> Should i make another removal request ? Would you like to do it ? I'm > >>> super-busy right now. > >> > >> I've filed the RM bugs for the affected packages, some more may be > >> required for their reverse dependencies. > > > > Thank you. Can we close this bug now ? > > No, ftp-master has not removed all the rdeps yet, so there are still RM > bugs blocking this issue. Now the same is going to happen with "powerpc" arch: libv8 is actually not compatible with all processors supported by debian (ppc64xx are ok, though). Sebastiaan, i feel bad asking for your help again, but since you already filled all the RM bugs once, i suppose you're in the best position to do it again for powerpc. Jérémy.