On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 04:27:45PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2016-10-15 16:09, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pocl > > Right, pocl FTBFS everywhere except linux-i386/amd64, and always has > (with maybe some spurious successes when tests were not being run). > Everything outdated on the release architectures has been decrufted. > > Or did you want to file a *wishlist* bug to support more architectures? > FTBFS on an architecture where it has not been built before (i.e. no > outdated binary packages in the archive that would prevent testing > migration) is not RC.
Well, the thing is that bug #840725 of libhmsbeagle was reopened[1] because libpoclu-dev is not available on most architectures. Since libhmsbeagle has build on all those architectures either the set of Build-Depends has changed (may be together with khronos-opencl-clhpp?) or there was a point in time when pocl has build on more architectures than currently. So if the fact remains that pocl does not build anywhere else than on intel I need to restrict the set of architectures for libhmsbeagle as well. Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840725;msg=22 -- http://fam-tille.de