Hi I'm the one to blame. I built it on stable.
The problem is easy to solve by stepping the revision and building on unstable. I can not do that today but hopefully later this week. // Ola On 19 October 2016 at 23:26, Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > Hi, > > Jacek Szafarkiewicz wrote: > > tigervnc-common needs libgnutls-deb0-28 on amd64 architecture. > > I think this dep should be for arm64. > > Nope, the amd64 package has been built on Debian Stable instead of > Debian Unstable and then uploaded to Debian Unstable anyways. > > See https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libgnutls-deb0-28 > > (arm64 from debports doesn't count anymore, it's already in Debian > proper for multiple years.) > > Nevertheless, this is definitely a serious issue and tigervnc on > amd64 needs to be rebuilt in a clean chroot, e.g. by requesting a > BinNMU for it. (Which the maintainer of the package should do. > > Without that, the package won't migrate to testing. > > Regards, Axel > -- > ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ > : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin > `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 > `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE > > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-tigervnc-devel mailing list > pkg-tigervnc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-tigervnc-devel > -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / o...@debian.org Folkebogatan 26 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 68 KARLSTAD | | http://inguza.com/ +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / ---------------------------------------------------------------