control: severity -1 important control: retitle -1 python-pysam: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures: segmentation fault in testsuite
On 2016-10-23 12:25, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 23/10/16 00:48, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On 2016-10-21 15:15, James Cowgill wrote: > >> On 21/10/16 14:55, YunQiang Su wrote: > >>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > >>> <po...@debian.org> wrote: > >>>> Control: severity -1 serious > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 22:29:48 -0700 Afif Elghraoui <a...@debian.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> Control: severity -1 important > >>>>> Control: tag -1 + help > >>>>> > >>>>> Hello and thank you for the report. > >>>>> > >>>>> على الجمعـة 19 آب 2016 ‫14:48، كتب Jonathan Jackson: > >>>>>> Package: python-pysam > >>>>>> Version: 0.9.1.4+ds-1 > >>>>>> Severity: grave > >>>>>> Justification: renders package unusable > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> While the package may be unusable on mips64el, it works well for the > >>>>> vast majority of users as I understand it, so this situation deserves a > >>>>> severity of 'important' rather than 'grave'. > >>>> > >>>> mips64el is a release architecture, thus this bug is serious. > >>> > >>> mips64el seems building successfully now, while mipsel fails. > >>> I guess it is due to Loongson machine. > >> > >> If mips64el has built (possibly one of the build machines is 'nicer' to > >> it), is this bug RC anymore? > >> > >>> Let me have a give-back on mipsel. > >> > >> While it could help, the same segfault happens on armel, mipsel and x32 > >> according to the build logs. I don't think it's hardware specific. > >> > >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=python-pysam > > > > I agree with this analysis. I confirm it doesn't build either on > > eller.d.o and from what I have been able to start debugging with GDB, it > > rather looks like some bug in the 32-bit support. There is something > > wrong in htslib or the cython code which doesn't convert C struct into > > Python struct correctly. > > > > I therefore also suggest to downgrade the severity of this bug, maybe > > also retitling it to say it fail to all 32-bit architectures. > > Sounds good. > Ok, doing so with this mail. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net