Control: retitle -1 mono: FTBFS on several architectures On 12/10/16 10:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Source: mono > Version: 4.6.1.3+dfsg-4 > Severity: serious > > Your package failed to build on mipsel: > > chmod +x _tmpinst/bin/al > if test -w /«BUILDDIR»/mono-4.6.1.3+dfsg/mcs; then :; else chmod -R +w > /«BUILDDIR»/mono-4.6.1.3+dfsg/mcs; fi > cd /«BUILDDIR»/mono-4.6.1.3+dfsg/mcs && /usr/bin/make --no-print-directory -s > NO_DIR_CHECK=1 PROFILES='binary_reference_assemblies net_4_x xbuild_12 > xbuild_14 ' CC='gcc' all-profiles > mkdir -p -- build/deps > build/profiles/basic.make:93: recipe for target > 'build/deps/basic-profile-check.exe' failed > make[7]: *** [build/deps/basic-profile-check.exe] Error 1 > *** The compiler 'false' doesn't appear to be usable. > *** Trying the 'monolite' directory. > long_mul R91 <- R76 R88 > * Assertion: should not be reached at mini-mips.c:2229
This is now also failing to build on armel, armhf and ppc64el (in addition to mipsel). At least the armel and armhf failures are rather similar, except the assertion obviously comes from mini-arm.c. ppc64el fails with a segfault instead: build/profiles/basic.make:93: recipe for target 'build/deps/basic-profile-check.exe' failed make[7]: *** [build/deps/basic-profile-check.exe] Error 1 *** The compiler 'false' doesn't appear to be usable. *** Trying the 'monolite' directory. Stacktrace: Segmentation fault This is preventing mono 4.6.x from going into testing. Cheers, Emilio
