On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 02:47:33PM +1300, Matt Brown wrote: > I did however discover one minor bug that occurred when the stop target > of the init script was run twice in a row and resulted in some ugly > error output from trying to read the non-existant pidfile. The > functionality was still correct, but it didn't look nice.
Should the check
[ ! -f "$PIDFILE" ] && return 1
cover that? I don't see why that should fail, if the PIDFILE does not exist
it should not go ahead and try to read from it.
Regards
Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
