Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:32:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318261: fixed in nedit 1:5.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: nedit
Status: install ok installed
Installed-Size: 1796
Architecture: i386
Version: 1:5.5-1

In my debian sid installation with
xserver-xorg                              6.8.2.dfsg.1-7
lesstif2                                  0.93.94-11.4

nedit does not start. Instead, i get an error:
$ nedit
X Error of failed request:  BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
  Major opcode of failed request:  70 (X_PolyFillRectangle)
  Serial number of failed request:  366
  Current serial number in output stream:  376

In an older sid installation on the same computer that i still have with
xserver-xfree8 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1
lesstif2       0.93.94-11.4
the problem does not occur.

In both installations, the X server uses
Driver      "ati"

The video card in use is
0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage Pro AGP 
1X/2X (rev 5c)

cheers,

wolfgang


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: nedit
Source-Version: 1:5.5-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nedit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

nedit_5.5-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/n/nedit/nedit_5.5-2.diff.gz
nedit_5.5-2.dsc
  to pool/main/n/nedit/nedit_5.5-2.dsc
nedit_5.5-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/nedit/nedit_5.5-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexandre Pineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated nedit package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  6 Feb 2006 23:34:45 +0100
Source: nedit
Binary: nedit
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:5.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alexandre Pineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Alexandre Pineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 nedit      - A powerful, customizable, Motif based text editor
Closes: 318261 330048 343703 349124
Changes: 
 nedit (1:5.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * add Nedit icon to menu entry (in debian/menu and debian/rules)
   * acknowledge the changes from the non maintainer upload
     (Closes: #349124)
   * correct FSF adress in debian/copyright file
   * Standards-Version bumped to 3.6.2.2 -- no changes.
   * remove libxmu-dev from build-depends (useless)
   * remove -DBUILD_UNTESTED_NEDIT from Makefile.linux and remove test
     on BUILD_UNTESTED_NEDIT flag in util/misc.c
     Indeed, the use of a specific version has no sense for a shared
     library. (Closes: #343703)
   * apply patch Xorg-32.diff from Nedit upstream to util/misc.c to correct
     an issue with Xorg (Closes: #330048, #318261)
Files: 
 e1c04fad16c3ae089de7935c57a34fa7 682 editors optional nedit_5.5-2.dsc
 31a17b3dffd9b64cf379afffd9aab5a4 11144 editors optional nedit_5.5-2.diff.gz
 c895e8f1e25deaa895c050cb5331a7e0 772708 editors optional nedit_5.5-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD+Kj5Zvwdf4aUbWkRAuAwAKCMaOzP5foPXw8xYCz5yjun8XekeQCgqpn9
Y2lxZf2g2dKetQGvYpXuthY=
=nMvj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to