Hi Sebastian, Am 13.12.16 um 21:54 schrieb Sebastian Andrzej Siewior: > Could someone please enlighten me what is wrong here? The dep in -2 is > libssl-dev | libssl1.0-dev > which makes no sense becuase it should be either the one or the other. > So the -2 build took libssl-dev and built against 1.1.0 successfully (as > far as I can tell). This means that the libssl1.0-dev could be dropper > because it was not used on the buildd.
you are true. I missed that libssl-dev in jessie is 1.0.1. Cheers, Jan. -- Never write mail to <w...@spamfalle.info>, you have been warned! -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M+ V- PS PE Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h---- r+++ y++++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
