On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 16:13 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 07:56:36PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Thankfully none of that worked. I say thankfully, because you'd have > > given release.d.o an allegedly RC bug (it may be RC for e2fsprogs, it's > > certainly not so for release.d.o) and removed the original bug from > > where it belongs. (The binNMU doesn't resolve the fact that the original > > issue existed - and for some versions still exists - in e2fsprogs.) > > It only exists in the versions of e2fsprogs shipping in Jessie and > before. So unless the SRM's think that it's worth it to fix this > issue via a change to e2fsprogs going to proposed-updates for Jessie > (I'm not entirely convinced but if you want me to add the Built-Using > and ask for a update to Jessie stable, I can do that, and we can punt > on the binNMU for e2fsck-static since it will be obsoleted by the fix > of e2fsprogs in Debian stable.)
I already scheduled the binNMUs for the handful of architectures that I could, in the cloned #849488. You may wish to check the architecture list there and confirm whether any of the others were typoes or if the three architectures mentioned are sufficient. Regards, Adam
