Hi Thank you. I'll check again. I probably failed to check this as most were rejected and I checked almost all other lines.
// Ola On 29 December 2016 at 22:03, Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > Control: found -1 1.6.0+dfsg-4 > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 07:18:11PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >> Hi Salvatore >> >> I have looked into this bug however and this one is indeed solved. >> Unless I'm looking with very grumble eyes (I probably do as I should >> be in bed). > > The problem should be in lines 1079-1090: > > 1077 else > 1078 { > 1079 /* > 1080 * No point in doing the extra work involved in an Xrealloc if > 1081 * the region is empty > 1082 */ > 1083 newReg->size = 1; > 1084 Xfree((char *) newReg->rects); > 1085 newReg->rects = (BoxPtr) Xmalloc(sizeof(BoxRec)); > 1086 } > 1087 } > 1088 Xfree ((char *) oldRects); > 1089 return; > 1090 } > > The patch from Red Hat, does add a check for newReg->rects, which in above is > missing (cf. Lines after 1085). > > Hope this helps. > > Regards, > Salvatore -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / o...@debian.org Folkebogatan 26 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 68 KARLSTAD | | http://inguza.com/ +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / ---------------------------------------------------------------