Your message dated Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:23:11 -0500
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#845734: statsmodels: FTBFS: TypeError: 'float' object 
cannot be interpreted as an index
has caused the Debian Bug report #845734,
regarding pandas FTBFS on i386 due to test failures
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
845734: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=845734
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pandas
Version: 0.19.1-1
Severity: serious

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pandas&arch=i386&ver=0.19.1-1&stamp=1479504883

...
======================================================================
ERROR: test_frame_from_json_to_json 
(pandas.io.tests.json.test_pandas.TestPandasContainer)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pandas/io/tests/json/test_pandas.py",
 line 272, in test_frame_from_json_to_json
    _check_all_orients(self.frame)
  File 
"/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pandas/io/tests/json/test_pandas.py",
 line 246, in _check_all_orients
    check_index_type=False, check_column_type=False)
  File 
"/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pandas/io/tests/json/test_pandas.py",
 line 175, in _check_orient
    unser = unser.sort_index()
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'unser' referenced before assignment

======================================================================
ERROR: test_misc_example (pandas.io.tests.json.test_pandas.TestPandasContainer)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pandas/io/tests/json/test_pandas.py",
 line 743, in test_misc_example
    result = read_json('[{"a": 1, "b": 2}, {"b":2, "a" :1}]', numpy=True)
  File 
"/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pandas/io/json.py", 
line 281, in read_json
    date_unit).parse()
  File 
"/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pandas/io/json.py", 
line 346, in parse
    self._parse_numpy()
  File 
"/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pandas/io/json.py", 
line 541, in _parse_numpy
    precise_float=self.precise_float)
SystemError: ../Objects/listobject.c:290: bad argument to internal function
...


A lot more errors follow.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.19.2-2

so -- I have swallowed the bullet and disabled more of the tests on
non-amd64 architectures -- there are bugs I can't reproduce, and
acknowledged by numpy to not be fixed any time soon.   Since it now
builds on i386 -- I am closing #845734.

unfortunately it still FTBFS on s390x with a glorious number of
failures.  Some of which are as nice as infinite recursion within
matplotlib (filing a bug report against matplotlib as of speaking).
So, if keen on helping -- have a look at 
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pandas&arch=s390x&ver=0.19.2-2&stamp=1484181310
before lazy/busy me simply ignores those tests as well on s390 ;)

On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:

> > > > the attached patch fixes the FTBFS. What is the schedule to fix the
> > > > other problems with statsimage -- especially pandas?

> > > I learned that NeuroDebian is happy about team uploads / NMUs - so
> > > I think its fine if you upload your patch.

> > I've also migrated pandas to Debian Science Git[1].  When trying to
> > build I can not reproduce the actual error #845734 but the build fails
> > with 

> > ...
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Ran 10983 tests in 1233.196s

> > FAILED (SKIP=280, errors=4, failures=5)

> FWIW
> actual errors and failures reports are above somewhere -- below is just
> what else was captured in the outputs 

> I quickly tried new release 0.19.2 and had total 
> FAILED (SKIP=277, errors=4, failures=7)
-- 
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Center for Open Neuroscience     http://centerforopenneuroscience.org
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to