severity 816989 important thanks On Mon, 30 May 2016, Steven Capper wrote:
> On 28 May 2016 at 21:12, Tobias Frost <t...@debian.org> wrote: > Severity: -1 important > > On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 10:00:12 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.e > s> wrote: > > retitle 816989 tbb: FTBFS in testing (Build killed with signal TERM > after 150 minutes of inactivity) > > severity 816989 serious > > thanks > > > > This is a normal FTBFS, not related at all with "dpkg-buildpackage > -A" > > > > The package is "blacklisted" in reproducible builds: > > > > https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/tbb.html > > > > so I'm not the only one to reproduce this. > > > > > > I tried to reproduce this, but I was not able to do it in a local sid > pbuilder envrioment, neither building nor when only building arch- > independt. So I think we should downgrade it.. > > > > Hi, > Sorry about getting back to this late. > I am unable to reproduce the stall here on amd64. > > I can see 4.3~20150611-1~exp3 passes the test? > https://reproducible.debian.net/rbuild/experimental/amd64/tbb_4.3~20150611-1~exp3.rbuild.log > > I will better familiarise myself with FTBFS; one thing I have found is that > the unit tests can hang on > certain boxes. I can't reproduce this any longer. I have the following build logs: Status: successful tbb_4.3~20150611-2_amd64-20161105T214911Z Status: successful tbb_4.3~20150611-2_amd64-20161106T001004Z Status: successful tbb_4.3~20150611-2_amd64-20161106T001006Z Status: successful tbb_4.3~20150611-2_amd64-20170113T115103Z Holger, this package used to be banned in reproducible builds, and it also hanged by sbuild. But now it builds for me. Do you think it would be possible to unban it temporarily in reproducible builds and see what happens? Thanks.
