Am 14.01.2017 um 18:02 schrieb Michael Biebl: > binutils_2.27.90.20170114-1. Building in stretch chroot though was > successful. So my observation is: > > binutils_2.27.90.20170114-1: fails > binutils_2.27.90.20170113-1: fails > binutils_2.27.51.20161220-1: ok > > So it looks like a mips related regression in binutils at a first > glance. In the past, systemd built reasonably reliably on mips* [3].
A notable difference (aside from binutils) between the sid and stretch chroot is gcc-6, which is at version 6.2.1-5 in stretch and 6.3.0-2 in unstable. I couldn't test this combination (old binutils + new gcc) on the porter boxes though. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature