On 02/02/17 22:37, Phil Armstrong wrote:
On 02/02/17 21:50, Michael Biebl wrote:
Are you absolutely sure? We had another bug report who said that
downgrading systemd+udev to 232-1 did fix the problem on ppc(64).
This is a ppc32 system, so maybe that makes the difference? I’ll test
it again over the weekend.
I must have made an error before: After carefully binary chopping the
systemd package versions from snapshot.debian.org, I can report that the
last version to work correctly is systemd 232-10. 232-11 fails.
Looking at the changelog & the service files, this is kind of
unsurprising: the service files for 232-10 don’t contain any
RestrictAddressFamilies entries on my system, whereas the ones for
232-11 do & the changelog for 232-11 contains this entry:
* Fix RestrictAddressFamilies=
Backport upstream fix for setting up seccomp filters to fix
RestrictAddressFamilies= on non-amd64 architectures. Drop the hack from
debian/rules to remove this property from unit files.
See #843160
So either the upstream fix doesn’t work on powerpc32 or the backport is
broken somehow. I appreciate that ppc32 is a minority platform at this
point.
cheers, Phil
