Control: reopen -1 On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:56:31 +0200 Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 03:00:49PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > I agree, BrowserLauncher was interesting before Java 6, but the Desktop > > API is good enough for most usages now. > > Thanks to Ole's patch to jmodeltest which was uploaded some hours ago > I'd be even fine to remove BrowserLauncher not only from Stretch but > also from sid if it has no other reverse dependencies. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > >
Hi, I am sorry, but I have to reopen this. It appears to me that jmodeltest still *Build*-Depends on libbrowserlauncher-java. From dak: """ $ dak ls -s testing jmodeltest jmodeltest | 2.1.10+dfsg-4 | testing | source, all $ dak rm -nR -s testing libbrowserlauncher-java Will remove the following packages from testing: libbrowserlauncher-java | 1.3+dfsg-1 | [...] Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers [...] ------------------- Reason ------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Build-Depends: jmodeltest: libbrowserlauncher-java Dependency problem found. """ Thanks, ~Niels
