Michael Stapelberg: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle < > michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> [...] >>> 0.7.0+ds-3), golang-protobuf-extensions (= 0+git20150513.fc2b8d3-4) >>> -- >>> Package: golang-github-gosexy-gettext-dev >>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2) >>> -- >>> Package: golang-github-hashicorp-go-msgpack-dev >>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2) >>> -- >>> Package: golang-github-stretchr-objx-dev >>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2) >>> -- >>> Package: golang-github-kr-pty-dev >>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2) >>> >>> This case could be ignored by the rebuild scripts, or binnmus could be >>> trigerred to get rid of the other versions. I'm not sure it makes sense >>> to ship >>> that many copies of golang in stretch. >>> >>> I think I read something about an organized plan to get rid of such extra >>> packages using binnmus, but maybe I was dreaming. Ccing debian-release@. >>> >> >> [...] >> > > Updating or dropping the field seems fine with me. Could you do these 4 > binNMUs so that we can close out this bug please? :) >
They seem to be arch:all packages. We cannot binNMU arch:all packages, only architecture dependent ones. :-/ Thanks, ~Niels