Hi,

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 01:34:41PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 08:10:08AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > It seems that not all of these are actually affected. Most are, but the
> > things including google breakpad for their crash reporter stuff have
> > a newer version of this apparently:
> > [...]
> >
> > which on a first glance looks BSDish and OKsh to me.
> 
> Interesting. It looks like breakpad developers just changed the license
> without any explanation:
> 
> https://chromium.googlesource.com/breakpad/breakpad/+/14bbefbd9600e08d
> 
> I wonder if they actually got a permission from Unicode, Inc. to relicense
> those files.

Asked in #libreoffice-dev (upstream using breakpad, too, disabled in Debian
builds):

21:14 < _rene_> moggi: do you have good contact with the breakpad guys?
21:15 <@moggi> _rene_: I have talked to the mozilla breakpad guy a few times, 
               why?
21:15 -!- ohallot [~thunde...@mvx-189-45-131-207.mundivox.com] has joined 
          #libreoffice-dev
21:16 < _rene_> moggi: see http://bugs.debian.org/864729. totally unrelated 
                package, just saw it
21:16 < _rene_> BUT
21:16 < _rene_> mozilla includes that too via breakpad
21:17 < _rene_> and they did relicense to something BSDish
21:18 <@moggi> _rene_: I know the reviewer of the license change
21:19 < _rene_> so I wonder what went up there and whether Unicode relicensed it
21:19 < _rene_> and for everything or for Google only (where the latter would 
                also violate the DFSG)
21:19 < loircbot> LibreOffice (core) tamas.zolnai * 
                  svx/source/table/tablecontroller.cxx: tdf#109050: Moving 
                  table object with ALT+Arrow keys does not work properly
21:21 <@moggi> _rene_: 
               https://bugs.chromium.org/p/google-breakpad/issues/detail?id=270
21:22 < _rene_> ah, thanks

which says:

--- snip ---
Project Member Comment 6 by ted.miel...@gmail.com, Jan 21 2015
Gervase Markham told me that Mark Davis (original author of the code) told him 
via private email that the license on this code is now the standard Unicode 
license, which is an acceptable open source license. I would love to get that 
in a public venue, but I think we can safely replace the license on these files 
with the Unicode license.

Comment 7 by gerv.mar...@gmail.com, Feb 4 2015
Specifically, Mark's email said:

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Gervase Markham <g...@mozilla.org> wrote:
>     * Unicode, Inc. hereby grants the right to freely use the information
>     * supplied in this file in the creation of products supporting the
>     * Unicode Standard

​It is now covered by http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html#Exhibit1

Mark
--- snip ---

Regards,

Rene

> 
> --
> Dmitry Shachnev

Reply via email to