Your message dated Thu, 17 Aug 2017 17:35:38 +0200
with message-id <6164580.9KX5ojMMXr@tuxin>
and subject line Re: Bug#869008: qtwebengine-opensource-src: FTBFS:
unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libqt5opengl5-dev (>= 5.9.0~),
libqt5webchannel5-dev (>= 5.9.0~), libqt5xmlpatterns5-dev (>= 5.9.0~),
qtbase5-private-dev (>= 5.9.0~), qtdeclarative5-private-dev (>= 5.9.0~),
qtscript5-private-dev (>= 5.9.0~), libqt5sql5-sqlite (>= 5.9.0~),
qtbase5-doc-html (>= 5.9.0~), qttools5-dev-tools (>= 5.9.0~)
has caused the Debian Bug report #869008,
regarding algobox: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: qtwebengine5-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
869008: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=869008
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: algobox
Version: 1.0.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Install package build dependencies
> |
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
> Setup apt archive
> -----------------
>
> Merged Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), qtbase5-dev, qtwebengine5-dev
> Filtered Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), qtbase5-dev, qtwebengine5-dev
> dpkg-deb: building package 'sbuild-build-depends-algobox-dummy' in
> '/<<BUILDDIR>>/resolver-MDbFki/apt_archive/sbuild-build-depends-algobox-dummy.deb'.
> dpkg-scanpackages: warning: Packages in archive but missing from override
> file:
> dpkg-scanpackages: warning: sbuild-build-depends-algobox-dummy
> sbuild-build-depends-core-dummy
> dpkg-scanpackages: info: Wrote 2 entries to output Packages file.
> Ign:1 copy:/<<BUILDDIR>>/resolver-MDbFki/apt_archive ./ InRelease
> Get:2 copy:/<<BUILDDIR>>/resolver-MDbFki/apt_archive ./ Release [963 B]
> Ign:3 copy:/<<BUILDDIR>>/resolver-MDbFki/apt_archive ./ Release.gpg
> Get:4 copy:/<<BUILDDIR>>/resolver-MDbFki/apt_archive ./ Sources [506 B]
> Get:5 copy:/<<BUILDDIR>>/resolver-MDbFki/apt_archive ./ Packages [587 B]
> Fetched 2056 B in 0s (0 B/s)
> Reading package lists...
> Reading package lists...
>
> Install algobox build dependencies (apt-based resolver)
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Installing build dependencies
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Reading state information...
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> sbuild-build-depends-algobox-dummy : Depends: qtwebengine5-dev but it is not
> going to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> apt-get failed.
The full build log is available from:
http://aws-logs.debian.net/2017/08/07/algobox_1.0.1+dfsg-1_unstable.log
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 5.9.0+dfsg-3
Hey,
the 5.9.0+dfsg-1 shouldn't never enter sid, this version was proposed to go to
experimental, but sbuild worked against me :( I think I now fixed my
scripting... Together with the Qt 5.9 transition the needed packages now
enters sid and this issue is solved.
Best Regards,
sandro
On Donnerstag, 20. Juli 2017 07:44:30 CEST Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: qtwebengine-opensource-src
> Version: 5.9.0+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: buster sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170719 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
