On 2017-08-22 16:52:12 [+0900], Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote: > Quack, Hi,
> This may be what people using ucf expect, and in this case you might > probably close the bug, but I don't find this a nice behavior. To me > disengaging debconf mean: leave as it is, I'll take care of it from now > on. I should at least have a choice even if the file was not modified > manually yet. The only change which I find legitimate is to remove the > "managed by debconf" header. @team: any opinion here? > Hope this is clearer. > > \_o< > Sebastian
