On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 00:46 +0800, Liang Guo wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 14:21 +0200, Alexander Kurtz wrote: > > > Ok, that's what I figured. Is there at least a solution to the "if the > > > user has the standard, most recent, Debian kernel running, make sure > > > the corresponding headers are installed" problem? I.e. something like > > > Ubuntu's "linux-{image,headers}-generic" packages? > > > > No, there is no common metapackage name that is available on all Debian > > architectures. (I don't think those metapackages are available on all > > Ubuntu architectures either.) > > Is it possible for kernel to provide a package , such as linux-full, depends > on > the exact version of linux-image and linux-header. When the same linux-image > and linux-header are needed, this package can be put on depends field.
I've given my answer. I'm going to be ignoring further questions on this. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Anthony's Law of Force: Don't force it, get a larger hammer.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part