On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 10:21:51PM +0000, Antonio Radici wrote:
as I said on the original thread I'm planning to fix this, and as you can see there have been no new releases until the fix is in place.
It would be great if you could summarize *in this bug* what's your plan of action.
We are packaging neomutt, but calling it mutt. The obvious solution is to rename the package. "mutt" could be used as transitional name to smoothly handle upgrades. This would not need to live for more than one release.
This would not proclude someone else from packaging "vanilla" mutt if they wanted to.
-- Jonathan Dowland
