Am 01.01.2018 um 17:55 schrieb gregor herrmann: > On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 23:41:05 +0100, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: >> Am 15.12.2017 um 16:51 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: [...] >>> Why was this renamed to openshot-qt? Upstream is still called 'openshot', >>> so I'm >>> not sure it makes sense to embed the toolkit in the package name... >> my plan was to convert openshot into an empty transitional package which >> depends on openshot-qt. > > That's an option.
Hi again, thanks for your input. I've looked again at the package, and upstream did rename most relevant parts to "openshot-qt". The program itself (in /usr/bin) is called "openshot-qt", the manpages are, the MIME type is, and so on. Therefore, I think the best option would be to upload the empty transitional package "openshot". If I reuse the package name, the package would be called openshot, but the executable would be openshot-qt. So the upgrade from stretch would work, but the "openshot" executable would be gone. This is a bit confusing, IMHO. So if nobody objects or has a better idea, I'll upload the transitional package in the next couple of days. Regards, Tobias
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
