On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 21:24 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 09:10:48PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 11:57 -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > > I'll take another look as soon as I get a chance. > > IMHO a bin NMU would be enough in this case. > A binNMU will change the rpath but not fix the bug: > > The alpha binary has a rpath of: > /build/buildd/subversion-1.3.0/BUILD/subversion/libsvn_subr/.libs:/build/buildd/subversion-1.3.0/BUILD/subversion/libsvn_repos/.libs > which is still wrong. Uh, yes. But a bin NMU for x86 would fix the biggest problem, the security related one. Is it possible by the buildd admins to (re-)schedule a rebuild of SVN? Maybe that would be enough as well for as a quick workaround, but still beware that I could not compile it for x86 due to the Java related segmentation fault.
Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]