On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 20:47:20 +0200, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote:
> > > Some recent change in unstable makes arch-test FTBFS:  
> >   
> > > This might be a regression somewhere in the MinGW packages,
> > > maintainer is Cc'ed.  
> 
> > Thanks for the report, this is indeed a recent regression in binutils 
> > (2.29.1-10 works, 2.29.1-13 doesn’t).  
> 
> On the other hand, taking Stretch's version of binutils-mingw-w64 and
> building it against current binutils (2.30-11) is free of this regression.
> The resulting package is 2.30-11+7.4.

Thanks Adam, that put me on the right track. I forgot to credit you in the
changelog for the upload, I’ll fix that in the next upload —
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/binutils-mingw-w64/commit/0bdfdad0b2dfdbd6f05b2396b30901c4ab96b370

Regards,

Stephen

Attachment: pgpeRFvrREI8L.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to