On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:44:06AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > package sqlite3 > severity 339369 grave > thanks > [You forgot to send it to control@ , put back this to grave now.]
No, I didn't; it was Bcc:ed. > On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 22:06 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > what, you think the test suite is made up with tests that have nothing to do > > with the use of the library? > It *has* the real connection, I know. I just still wonder why there's > no other bugreports about libsqlite3-0 failing on hppa? Why only the > test case fails, in a restricted chroot? Do you have *positive* reports from hppa users that libsqlite3-0 works correctly on hppa? If not, one bug report indicating that it doesn't shouldn't be discarded so easily. > I have lost my hppa box when Sarge was released, but I will look/ask > around if someone can reproduce it on a normal hppa box or not. > Anyway I could tighten down this to the 'thread2-3.2' test, maybe > related to #326648 ; upstream change the thread handling and maybe > missed to update the testsuite? At least I have seen buggy testcases as > well. Those are all possibilities. They should be investigated prior to downgrading the bug, unless you have other evidence that the library does work on hppa today. > What's your opinion of enable test suite as part of the build process? > It takes a lot of time even on hppa and I think it would be an overkill > for arm. But it was asked for, see #339368. I think it's always best to enable testsuites at build time. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
