Hi, Geoff Crompton wrote: > Just like to bring bug #350964 back to the limelight. Briefly recapping > > Feb 2, I created the bug report > Feb 6, unstable fixed by Thomas > Feb 13 DSA 969-1 released > Feb 15 I questioned if sarge fixed, Thomas, Joey and Steve respond/discuss. > > At the moment it looks like Thomas is suggesting that DSA 969 didn't fix > this bug, but did fix another bug, the CVE mentioned in the DSA. > > I don't know if Thomas is saying this based on the text of the DSA, or > if he compared the actual package to the patch he suggested. It would be > great to get confirmation that either the DSA did fix this bug, or that > another DSA might be needed.
I didn't check the CVE numbers now, but the current package in stable/ testing/unstable fixes both critical bugs that were discovered in scponly. Tom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
