On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:45:39PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: > Hi, > > There's of course the question whether it should be removed altogether > > since it's orphaned, but that's a different one, and I don't see a > > pressing reason for that (there are a handful of users and no bugs). > > A couple of installations doesn't mean they ever bothered to configure > it. > I think the package shouldn't be in unstable either, maybe experimental. > The package is not fit for a wider audience; those that can really setup > minit are able to grab it from experimental or build it themselves. As it stands, this package will move to testing. Do you really want that to happen? I think an RC bug about "don't move to sarge" should remain RC even after sarge released, unless someone agreeing to maintain the package explicitly states that it is ready to be included in whatever the upcoming stable release is, and right now, the package doesn't have a maintainer, so I think this bug should remain opened, and perhaps clone+severity+reassign+retitle for removal, no?
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]