On Fri, 06 Jul 2018 at 23:43:57 -0400, Jason Duerstock wrote: > I suspect the "right" solution to this is to define the "base" and > "mask" variables in ComputeRandomAllocationAddress() based on what > works for each architecture
Perhaps, but I'd be surprised if the values provided by upstream
weren't right for at least amd64... and the code seems to be the same
in the latest Firefox, which runs fine on my laptop.
smcv
