Hi!
As said on IRC:
22:16 < bunk> elbrus: Are you sure patches like for #899582 are a good idea?
It would be fine if Q_ would do something like that, but when
no team member did an upload to fix this (or asked to have the
list restored) in 2.5 months that will only hide a problem.
22:16 -zwiebelbot:#debian-devel- Debian#899582: libmad: Invalid maintainer
address [email protected] -
https://bugs.debian.org/899582
22:18 < jcristau> i think i'd set it to packages@qa instead :)
A big upside of this kind of bugs is revealing unmaintained packages.
I see no benefit for such a NMU: the package is in the key set, thus
doesn't even suffer from autoremovals.
We really want a maintainer upload to prove this package sees at least
occasional maintenance. If it doesn't, then, as jcristau said, it should be
orphaned eventually -- but there's no hurry in doing the latter. One of the
bug parties before Buster freeze would be a good time.
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ So a Hungarian gypsy mountainman, lumberjack by day job,
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ brigand by, uhm, hobby, invented a dish: goulash on potato
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ pancakes. Then the Polish couldn't decide which of his
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ adjectives to use for the dish's name.
