Hi, On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:09:41PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:22:54PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > But before going through that trouble, I think we'd need to get approval > > from the security team first, as that's quite a lot of work. I figured > > we would make a feasability study first... > > The current data structure works very well for us and splitting the files > has many downsides. > > If we can't get the repository in run on salsa in a manner that doesn't > impact other repositories (e.g. by disabling the repository browser or > similar), then moving the security tracker repository out of Salsa is > the more likely solution. > > Did anyone follow Guido's suggestion to report this upstream to > get their assessment on possible optimisations?
Just in case someone takes this upstream. I've filed https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913124 against git a couple of days ago. Cheers, -- Guido