Your message dated Sun, 6 Jan 2019 12:07:22 +0200
with message-id 
<CAD=WrcJ3F6G1f=4eqcoe4xgz4enxjwknrocoqcpzvxgukrq...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: plastimatch FTBFS with libdlib-dev 19.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #895741,
regarding plastimatch: Uninstallable
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
895741: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895741
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: plastimatch
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

It seems that plastimatch is uninstallable in Sid:

# apt-get install plastimatch
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 plastimatch : Depends: libdlib18 but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
#

Best regards
Torquil Sørensen

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.16.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_GB:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages plastimatch depends on:
ii  libblas3 [libblas.so.3]      3.8.0-1
ii  libc6                        2.27-3
pn  libdcmtk12                   <none>
pn  libdlib18                    <none>
ii  libfftw3-double3             3.3.7-1+b1
ii  libgcc1                      1:8.1.0-5
ii  libgdcm2.8                   2.8.6-2
ii  libgomp1                     8.1.0-5
pn  libinsighttoolkit4.12        <none>
ii  liblapack3 [liblapack.so.3]  3.8.0-1
ii  libstdc++6                   8.1.0-5

plastimatch recommends no packages.

plastimatch suggests no packages.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 15 May 2018 23:50:49 -0400 Hugo Lefeuvre <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Yes, it is most likely a bug in the dlib package. Last dlib updates made
> Debian packaging considerably trickier by separating build of static
> files and build of shared libraries. I have just noticed that we ship
> the cmake config files of the shared build into the -dev package, which
> might be the source of your problems. In fact, we should rather ship the
> files produced by the static build (but still, I'm not 100% it's going to
> be sufficient).
>
> I have just prepared an upload addressing this issue, but I had
> difficulties to build plastimatch with dlib 19.1 (configuration issues,
> plastimatch seems to to use deprecated directives), so I couldn't really
> test it.
>
> You can find test packages here[0]. Can you try them ?

Dear Hugo,

I can confirm that plastimatch does build with dlib 19.10, so this issue is
resolved; thanks!

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to