Your message dated Sat, 12 Jan 2019 16:49:25 +0100
with message-id <20190112154923.cnos3mmqgoyb2...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#907015: openssl version 1.1.1 breaks multiple reverse
dependencies; versioned Breaks needed
has caused the Debian Bug report #907015,
regarding openssl version 1.1.1 breaks multiple reverse dependencies; versioned
Breaks needed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
907015: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907015
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openssl
Version: 1.1.1~~pre9-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks
Control: affects -1 src:ganeti src:libnet-ssleay-perl src:ruby-openssl
Control: affects -1 src:m2crypto src:python2.7 src:python3.6
Control: affects -1 src:python3.7 src:stunnel4 isync
Control: block -1 by 900161 906981 906955
Dear openssl maintainers,
With the upload of 1.1.1~~pre9-1 of openssl packages need to be ready
for the default security level bump that was introduced in openssl.
Currently we are seeing multiple packages that fail to run their
autopkgtest. We suspect that there may be quite some packages that have
similar run time issues that haven't been detected yet. There is also
already a first user bug report about a non-working reverse dependency.
We file this bug to:
1) allow reverse dependencies some time (we let you judge how long is
reasonable for the serious severity) to adapt to the new situation
2) enable the openssl package to collect information which packages it
breaks and which version of those package fix the issue. With that
information the openssl package can add versioned Breaks
We believe that the versioned Breaks are needed to enable a smooth
upgrade path for testing users as well as for users that upgrade from
stretch to buster. For users a Breaks is also required if the new
OpenSSL just exposed an existing bug in the reverse dependency.
Paul and Adrian
PS: I'll file (blocking) bugs against the reverse dependencies with
broken autopkgtests soon.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 08:15:23PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Although I have filed this bug (together with Adrian), I don't qualify
> myself as knowledgeable on when the right moment is to remove the block.
Paul just told me this should be ok now, so closing.
Ivo
--- End Message ---
