On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 6:30 AM Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Test cases that passed in patchelf 0.8 fail since 0.9, > > and segmentation fault on things like setting rpath > > might be close enough to "entirely broken". > > In that case, it would certainly help upstream if someone > (maintainer/porter) could try to "git bisect" the issue so that we can > better identify the issue. > > And maybe we want to revert to the former patchelf in Debian > (i.e. 0.9+really0.8) if it lasts too long. > The failing tests in 0.9 are new, in that the test is not the same as in 0.8. As I commented in the arch-RM bug, I don't think this is a regression (but I haven't checked at all). James Cowgill mentioned a change in glibc as the possible cause[1]. One way to test would be to run the test from 0.9 with the binary from 0.8. That said, I certainly welcome help. I'm completely overloaded right now so I can't look at this. [1] Thread at https://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2016/04/msg00004.html -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler
