On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 03:29:52PM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Santiago, > > > Ok, but this still should be fixed in stretch, right? > > (Packages in stretch must build in stretch). > > Sure thing, but this would require a stable update which seems a > little overkill, especially at this point in the buster release cycle…?
I don't see how the release cycle of buster is related. The relevant thing, IMO, is that proposed-updates and point releases still exist for stretch, so I don't see it overkill at all. Thanks.
