On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:36:54AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > reopen 365714 > thanks > > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 09:45:22AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > > Mmmm, missed closing in changelog. It does not depend on libxaw8-dev now > > (and on any other X -dev package indeed). This will cause almost > > certainly a good deal of FTBSs around. Great!!!! :-P > > This is pretty clearly the wrong fix. xaw3dg-dev now only Depends: xaw3dg > (= 1.5+E-12), xutils. Even ignoring the issue of static linking (it is > customary for -dev packages to depend on *all* other -dev packages they need > symbols from for static linking), of the 78 header files provided by > xaw3dg-dev, 69 of them need headers from at least one other X -dev package. > That makes it a policy violation, because xaw3dg-dev does not depend on > packages that it "requires for operation". > > FWIW, based on just the headers, the only missing dependencies are: > > Depends: libxt-dev, x11proto-core-dev, libxmu-dev >
I found libx11-dev, libxmu-headers, libxpm-dev, libxt-dev, x11proto-core-dev, x11proto-xext-dev by grepping and so... Due for next upload... -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
