Control: tags -1 + bullseye sid On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 10:04:28 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Setting up fuse (2.9.9-1) ... > dpkg: error processing package fuse (--configure): > installed fuse package post-installation script subprocess returned error > exit status 1 ... > # udevadm test --action -p /devices/virtual/misc/fuse > Invalid action '-p'
Similar to the equivalent fuse3 bug #934293, this seems to be a regression since buster: the same binary package installs OK on buster. Maybe udevadm became more strict about its parameter parsing? Similar to fuse3, it would be helpful if the maintainer script had less "> /dev/null 2>&1" so that error messages would appear. > I'm not exactly sure what this code is supposed to achieve. > Since fuse no longer ships its own udev rules, maybe it can be dropped > altogether? Or if the postinst is still necessary, maybe fuse3 could take over the fuse binary package name for bullseye (with a transitional package) so that bugs like this one don't need to be fixed in both places? smcv