Hello,
Thanks for pointing out there is still the issue. I realized my test was
using version 0.10.0-3 instead of 0.12.0-0.1 !
As one of the failing test: ../../tests/check_check_master.c:749:F:Core
Tests:test_check_all_ftypes:125: For test 125:Simple
Tests:test_ck_assert_ldouble_eq_tol failure type wrong, expected 2 but got 1
I wonder if it is not related to the double memory representation on
ppc64el ... usual story of 64bits-128bits may be ....
I Will try to investigate again
Thanks
On 9/22/2019 8:32 PM, Boyuan Yang wrote:
I submitted a self-service giveback request and had this package rebuilt on
ppc64el. It is still failing with GCC 9. Looks like further investigation is
needed.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=check
Thanks,
Boyuan Yang
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:57:02 +0200 "Thierry fa...@linux.ibm.com" <
thie...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2019 15:54:46 +0200 Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> wrote:
Source: check
Version: 0.12.0-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=check
...
FAIL: check_check_export
FAIL: check_check
PASS: test_output.sh
PASS: test_check_nofork.sh
PASS: test_check_nofork_teardown.sh
PASS: test_xml_output.sh
PASS: test_log_output.sh
PASS: test_set_max_msg_size.sh
PASS: test_tap_output.sh
========================================
Check 0.12.0: tests/test-suite.log
========================================
# TOTAL: 9
# PASS: 7
# SKIP: 0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL: 2
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
(powerpcspe builds with nocheck)
Could you recheck compilation as my last test with gcc-9 on SID passes. Thx
--
Thierry Fauck @ fr.ibm.com
--
Thierry Fauck @ fr.ibm.com
