On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 05:25:36PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 04:12:35PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > >> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> >> > Is there a way to avoid using this file ? > >> >> > >> >> That depends on why it is used. If it only uses the file, but does not > >> >> use latex2html itself, it can probably be replaced. Where can I have a > >> >> look at the new beta release? > >> > > >> > Well I put the updated package at > >> > <http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/pnmu/> > >> > >> It's easy - the file is completely unneeded. At least it is processed > >> fine without, and I found no usage of any of the commands defined in > >> html.sty. Since I don't understand the text, I didn't look at the > >> layout or so. > > > > What about > > \usepackage{html} > > \htmladdnormallink > > ? > > How should we proceed to build the package witout html.sty ? > > I didn't notice this - I only looked in tabela-simbolos-doc.tex which > was the only file that tried to load html.sty - and in fact after > commenting the respective \usepackage line in this file, the package > builds fine without latex2html. > > But this \htmladdnormallink can probably just be replaced by hyperref's > \href command, except that now the URL comes first, and the text is in > the second argument (and is typeset in \textt anyway). > > If latex2html is not used, it doesn't make sense to use html.sty at all > - so this change should be made upstream. > > > Care to report a bug ? > > Will you contact upstream anyway? Are you going to adopt the package, > or just do an NMU?
I was just trying to help fixing a RC bug, and abntex was the first on the list... Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here.
